What Issues Do Both The Kyoto Protocol And The Paris Agreement Address Brainly

God has endowed mankind with reason and ingenuity that distinguish us from other creatures. Ingenuity and creativity have enabled us to make remarkable progress and can help us tackle the problem of global climate change; However, we have not always used these foundations wisely. Past actions have produced both good and harmful works, as well as unforeseen or unforeseen consequences. Now we are faced with two central moral questions: The Paris Agreement is an agreement within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) that deals with the mitigation, adaptation and financing of greenhouse gas emissions and was signed in 2016. The wording of the agreement was negotiated by representatives of 196 States Parties at the 21st Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC at Le Bourget, near Paris, France, and was negotiated on 12 May. Adopted by consensus in December 2015.As November 2019, 195 members of the UNFCCC signed the agreement and 187 became parties. John Paul II, “The Exploitation of the Environment Threatens All Humanity,” Address to the Vatican Symposium on the Environment (1990), in Ecology and Faith: The Writings of Pope John Paul II, ed. Sr. Ancilla Dent, OSB (Berkhamsted, England: Arthur James, 1997), page 12 As part of the Copenhagen negotiations in 2009, a number of countries drafted the Copenhagen Accord. [29] The agreement states that global warming should be limited to less than 2.0°C (3.6°F). [29] This could be reinforced in 2015 with the aim of limiting warming to less than 1.5°C. [35] The agreement does not specify the reference value for these temperature targets (e.B.

compared to pre-industrial or 1990 temperatures). According to the UNFCCC, these targets relate to pre-industrial temperatures. [36] Catholic social teaching calls for courageous and generous action in the name of the common good. “Interdependence,” as Pope John Paul II wrote, “must be transformed into solidarity … The strongest and richest nations must defeat all forms of imperialism and be determined to preserve their own hegemony, and must have a sense of moral responsibility to other nations so that a true international system can be established on the basis of the equality of all peoples and the necessary respect for their legitimate differences. 11 The common good is built or diminished by the quality of public debate. With its scientific, technological, economic, political, diplomatic and religious dimensions, the challenge of global climate change can be a fundamental test for our democratic processes and political institutions. We respect the investigation and dialogue that has been conducted by a variety of academics, diplomats, policymakers, and advocates not only in the United States, but around the world. These efforts must not be humiliated or distorted by misinformation or exaggeration. Serious dialogue should not be compromised by public relations tactics that stoke fears or turn nations against each other. Leaders in all fields should seek to establish a scientific consensus for the common good; avoid simply representing their own interests, industries or movements; and act responsibly to protect future generations and vulnerable people. Over the past decade, a continuous process of international diplomacy has resulted in agreements on principles and, increasingly, on procedures.

In 1992, at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, more than 160 countries, including the United States, ratified the first international treaty on global climate change, known as the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). .